<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Offence &#8211; L Stack Isolation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ultimatehandbook.com/blog/2009/04/01/offence-l-stack-isolation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ultimatehandbook.com/blog/2009/04/01/offence-l-stack-isolation/</link>
	<description>the source for everything ultimate frisbee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denearo</title>
		<link>http://www.ultimatehandbook.com/blog/2009/04/01/offence-l-stack-isolation/comment-page-1/#comment-6112</link>
		<dc:creator>Denearo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultimatehandbook.com/blog/?p=46#comment-6112</guid>
		<description>Is the force actually home?  Looks like a home force according to the stack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the force actually home?  Looks like a home force according to the stack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ultimatehandbook &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Offence - L Stack Isolation Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.ultimatehandbook.com/blog/2009/04/01/offence-l-stack-isolation/comment-page-1/#comment-2443</link>
		<dc:creator>Ultimatehandbook &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Offence - L Stack Isolation Part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultimatehandbook.com/blog/?p=46#comment-2443</guid>
		<description>[...] the first article on the L Stack this article looks at the flow of this offence in more detail.  As stated before, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the first article on the L Stack this article looks at the flow of this offence in more detail.  As stated before, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreliem</title>
		<link>http://www.ultimatehandbook.com/blog/2009/04/01/offence-l-stack-isolation/comment-page-1/#comment-2440</link>
		<dc:creator>andreliem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultimatehandbook.com/blog/?p=46#comment-2440</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right BK, poaching can really dampen the benefits of this offence.  That being said, the best offence against poaching is to ensure every offensive player is a threat to get open.  The lane cutters in the L and handler should really seize any opportunity to get open.  This is another reason it&#039;s for advanced teams, it&#039;s really a free flowing offence where you need to work as a team and let whoever is in the lane to do their cut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right BK, poaching can really dampen the benefits of this offence.  That being said, the best offence against poaching is to ensure every offensive player is a threat to get open.  The lane cutters in the L and handler should really seize any opportunity to get open.  This is another reason it&#8217;s for advanced teams, it&#8217;s really a free flowing offence where you need to work as a team and let whoever is in the lane to do their cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bear Killer</title>
		<link>http://www.ultimatehandbook.com/blog/2009/04/01/offence-l-stack-isolation/comment-page-1/#comment-2439</link>
		<dc:creator>Bear Killer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultimatehandbook.com/blog/?p=46#comment-2439</guid>
		<description>I like it. I&#039;m seldom on squads with the athleticism to really want to use this O, but it&#039;s great if you&#039;ve got match-up advantages. Seems like you wouldn&#039;t want to run it against a team that really incorporates a lot of poaching into their defense, especially in bad weather.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it. I&#8217;m seldom on squads with the athleticism to really want to use this O, but it&#8217;s great if you&#8217;ve got match-up advantages. Seems like you wouldn&#8217;t want to run it against a team that really incorporates a lot of poaching into their defense, especially in bad weather.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

